AI Development

Production AI systems.
Built to run, not to demo.

We design, build, and operate AI systems that work under real-world conditions — unpredictable data, high stakes, zero tolerance for silent failures.

No pitch deck. No obligation. We'll tell you honestly if we're a fit.

EU-based senior team 7–12+ yrs experience 50+ systems shipped NDA-ready End-to-end ownership

The real problem

Most AI projects fail after the demo.

A model that scores 94% in a notebook is not a product. Production is a different environment with different failure modes — and most teams only discover this after budget is spent.

Data changes, model doesn't know

Production data drifts. Seasonality shifts. Upstream schemas break. A model trained last quarter silently degrades — and no alert fires.

Offline metrics don't reflect reality

An F1 score of 0.91 on a held-out test set means nothing if the test set doesn't match the distribution your model will face on Tuesday morning.

No one owns the model in production

Data science ships the model, DevOps runs the container, product owns the KPIs. Nobody has a runbook for when the model starts hallucinating at 2am.

Inference costs scale faster than value

You build a RAG pipeline, it works in staging, then usage grows and your LLM bill triples. Nobody designed the cost model from the start.

The "pilot" is permanent

Proof-of-concepts become the production system by accident. Hardcoded paths, no rollback, no monitoring. Six months later, nobody dares touch it.

Integration is underestimated

Connecting an AI model to existing systems — ERP, databases, legacy APIs — takes longer than building the model. Most teams only realize this mid-project.

What we build

Concrete capabilities, not abstract descriptions.

We work in four areas. If your problem doesn't fit, we'll tell you directly rather than overpromise.

Computer Vision

Object detection, segmentation, and classification in production environments with edge deployment, low-latency inference, and real-world data variance.

  • Detection and segmentation pipelines
  • Edge and on-device inference
  • Data annotation pipelines and tooling
  • Domain-specific training and fine-tuning
Deep dive: Computer Vision

LLM / RAG Systems

Retrieval-augmented generation and LLM pipelines grounded in your data — with evaluation harnesses, cost controls, and access management built in.

  • RAG architecture and chunking strategy
  • Hybrid search and re-ranking pipelines
  • RBAC and multi-tenant retrieval
  • Evaluation, hallucination detection, guardrails
Deep dive: LLM / RAG

ML for Business

Practical guide for business and product teams: when ML is worth it, where projects fail, and how to evaluate readiness before investing.

  • ML vs rule-based systems
  • Probability, thresholds, and business risk
  • Typical failure modes before production
  • Readiness checklist for teams and data
Deep dive: ML for Business

AI Consulting

Independent technical assessment of your AI strategy, architecture, or existing systems. We tell you what will and won't work — before you spend on it.

  • AI feasibility and risk assessment
  • Architecture review and redesign
  • Team upskilling and technical leadership
  • Vendor and tooling evaluation
Discuss your situation

Computer Vision

Vision systems that hold up in the field, not just the lab.

Real computer vision projects fail for predictable reasons: training data that doesn't match field conditions, models that can't handle edge cases, inference pipelines that break under load. We solve these before deployment, not after.

Crop disease detection at scale

We built the AgrigateVision system: drone-captured field imagery processed in real time, 40K+ images, multi-class detection with IoU-optimized training and on-device inference. See the case study →

AR interior fitting room

RoomIQ: real-time object placement using camera-based room estimation, hybrid classical + ML geometry engine, sub-100ms rendering on mobile. See the case study →

Technical deep dive: how CV systems work in production

What the engagement covers

Data pipeline — Ingestion, annotation review, augmentation strategy
Model selection — Architecture choice based on latency, hardware, and accuracy constraints
Training environment — Reproducible runs, experiment tracking, version control
Serving layer — ONNX/TRT export, batching, cold-start handling
Drift monitoring — Confidence distribution shifts, PSI, alert thresholds
Rollback plan — Shadow mode, A/B routing, canary deploys

Common failure modes we prevent

Wrong chunks retrieved — Poor chunking strategy, missing context windows
Hallucinations at scale — No grounding checks, no confidence thresholds
Uncontrolled costs — Every query hitting the LLM, no caching layer
No access control — All users retrieving all documents, GDPR violation
No evaluation loop — No RAGAS metrics, no way to detect regressions
Monolith architecture — Can't swap embedding model or vector store without full rewrite

LLM / RAG Systems

Enterprise search and automation on your data — without hallucinations and runaway costs.

Most RAG systems work fine in demos and break within weeks in production. The reasons are always the same: no evaluation harness, no cost model, no access controls. We build the boring infrastructure that makes LLMs reliable.

Hybrid search — keyword + semantic retrieval, BM25 + dense vector re-ranking
Evaluation pipeline — RAGAS metrics, answer quality tracking, regression detection
Cost architecture — semantic caching, query routing, tiered inference
Technical deep dive: LLM agents and RAG architecture

AI Infrastructure / MLOps

The infrastructure that keeps AI systems running after launch.

Shipping a model is not the end. Most production incidents happen in infrastructure: failed feature stores, broken training pipelines, alert fatigue, no rollback path. We build and operate the MLOps layer so your team can focus on the product.

Training pipelines — reproducible, versioned, CI-gated model promotion
Serving infrastructure — multi-model routing, canary deploys, shadow mode
Drift monitoring — PSI checks, feature distribution alerts, retraining triggers
Incident playbooks — on-call runbooks, rollback procedures, post-mortem templates
Read: why ML models fail in production

Stack we work with

PyTorch / ONNX / TensorRT
Kubeflow / MLflow / DVC
Kubernetes / Docker
Pinecone / Weaviate / pgvector
LangChain / LlamaIndex
Grafana / Prometheus
FastAPI / gRPC inference
PostgreSQL / ClickHouse

Stack is chosen to fit your constraints — not to match a default template.

Who we work with

When companies come to us.

We work best with teams that have tried something and hit a wall — not teams looking for a vendor who'll agree with everything. These are the situations where we add the most value.

"

Our model works in staging but degrades after two weeks in production. We don't know why.

→ Data drift, training-serving skew, or missing monitoring. We can diagnose and fix within discovery.

"

We built a RAG prototype that demos well, but the answers aren't reliable enough to ship to customers.

→ Chunking, retrieval quality, and evaluation harness are the usual culprits. Fixable without starting over.

"

We want to add computer vision to our process but have no idea if our data is good enough to start.

→ Data audit in 2–3 weeks. We'll tell you exactly what you have and what it's realistically worth.

"

Our data science team builds models, but they keep getting stuck at integration. We've had three failed handoffs to engineering.

→ We bridge data science and production engineering. This is a structural problem, not a skill gap.

"

We're spending $40K/month on LLM API calls. We need to cut costs without breaking the product.

→ Semantic caching, query routing, and tiered inference can typically cut costs 40–70% without quality loss.

"

We need an outside technical opinion. Our team is too close to the problem to see what's wrong.

→ Architecture review with a written report. Clear findings, no upsell pressure.

Frequently asked

How long does it take to ship a production AI system?

Discovery and architecture take 2–3 weeks. A production pilot runs 2–8 weeks depending on data readiness and integration complexity. Full rollout adds another 2–16 weeks. The biggest variable is data quality, not model selection.

We already have a model. Can you help productionize it?

Yes. Most of our engagements start with a model that 'works in notebooks' but isn't production-ready. We audit the pipeline, add monitoring, harden the serving layer, and set up rollback and incident response.

Do you work with internal teams or replace them?

Either. We can embed as a technical lead within your team, take full ownership end-to-end, or work as a bridge between data science and engineering. We adapt to your structure.

What domains do you work in?

Computer vision in agriculture and industrial settings, LLM/RAG pipelines for enterprise search and automation, algorithmic trading systems, and custom MLOps infrastructure. We do not take on projects outside our expertise.

Ready to talk?

Tell us your constraints.
We'll scope a delivery plan.

30-minute call. No pitch deck. We'll ask about your data, constraints, and timeline — and tell you honestly whether the problem is solvable and how.

EU-based team · 24h response · NDA available from day one